In functions involving pointers, is the pointer local to function or global? | Sololearn: Learn to code for FREE!
New course! Every coder should learn Generative AI!
Try a free lesson
+ 1

In functions involving pointers, is the pointer local to function or global?

Functions involving Pointers

13th Mar 2019, 11:01 PM
Deanne Faye Chiu
Deanne Faye Chiu - avatar
3 Answers
+ 3
The whole point of pointers (lol) is that they make this possible! Without a pointer, you are handing a *copy* of the value to the function. So if it messes with the copy, the original isn't effected. A pointer is something different: Imagine it as an address card! By handing it over, you are telling the function: 'Here's where that value sits in memory; please go get it yourself and change it if you need to!' If you write a in the function, it is the adress; if you write a*, it is the value, that's living at that adress. So by writing *a = whatever, you are taking the adress card, looking up the place and change what you find there.
13th Mar 2019, 11:36 PM
HonFu
HonFu - avatar
+ 1
I think only a global variable (sitting in the global space) is global, because it can be freely accessed by *everybody*. Passing a value via pointer to a function is more like granting this and only this function special privileges. And I'd say the pointer itself is local (you can only use the name inside the function); but it points to a value that hasn't been defined in this area.
13th Mar 2019, 11:18 PM
HonFu
HonFu - avatar
0
I have this code here #include <stdio.h> void square (int*); int main(){ int n = 7; square (&n); printf ("%i %p\n",n,&n); return 0; } void square (int *a){ printf ("%p\n",a); *a = *a * *a; } Given the code above, I'm really confused why the variable n becomes 49 instead of 7. I assumed that n will remain 7 because the function void square returns nothing
13th Mar 2019, 11:31 PM
Deanne Faye Chiu
Deanne Faye Chiu - avatar