+4

# How do you pass variables from one function to another without making it global, i havent been able to find out how.

ex def var_1(): x = 1 a = 2 def var_2(): y = x b = a print (y, b) var_2() I understand why this doesn't work but I'm trying to find out how to make it work without making x and a global variables.

12/17/2018 4:55:51 PM

Michael Lucas

+7

You could also use the return statement as follows. def var_1(): x = 1 a = 2 return x, a def var_2(): y, b = var_1() print(y, b) var_2()

+5

[Warning: this answer gets weird] Ok...to get a variable created you have to run var_1() somehow; to get values named in-scope (local, since you don't want global) Returning the vars *does* keep the "id" the same if that's what you're after...you're just installing new 'names' for a value that has not lost all of its references yet (the variable isn't passed; the name switches, even if it's the same in both places)...here's a nice article about names vs. values: https://nedbetchelder.com/text/names.html ##### Now...here's a way that's...neat but kindof wrong...if you accept that running a function creates a "local variable scope frame": https://code.sololearn.com/c2uDPhi23Ngo/?ref=app That's kindof the function's vars when it ran, but It's also kindof weird. (I'm only really including this to emphasize "local scope")

+3

using this code def var_2(x,a): y = x b = a print(y,b) def var_1(): x = 1 a = 2 var_2(x,a) var_1()

+3

Only on inner functions otherwise no way.

+2

Diego's answer is definitely the right one. How ever, you can also look at the concept of nonlocal variable if you are working in python 3. It localises the value of a variable within two functions (suppose A and B) where consider B to be an inner function declared in the statement of A function. If A is declared in the statement of another function, say X, then that nonlocal variable will not influence anything in function X. Example: def X(): var = 3 def A(): var = 2 def B(): nonlocal var var = 1 print(var) B() print (var) A() print(var) X() Answer: 1 1 3

+1

Kirk Schafer Indeed... that approach is "cringy" 🤣 Might I propose two less cringy options to consider... https://code.sololearn.com/cz9q6M621LSy/?ref=app and https://code.sololearn.com/cNMHNsZzqIjw/?ref=app Personally, I like the namedtuple because I prefer using the dot notation over brackets with quotes.

+1

KRISHNA I how do i call var_2 () ?

0

Use can use inner functions or looping functions def var_1() : X=1 A=2 def var_2() : Y=X B=A print(Y, B)

0

All of them are good actualy everybody has theyr way of coding there are millions of ways to do it just do it how you like it