+ 2
Could I again get some help in improving this code?
The 1st link shows how the code looked before. And I would like to thank Coder Kitten , Volodymyr Chelnokov and Nayeem Islam Shanto...শান্ত for helping me reach so far with this code. But now i have another problem, check out inside the 2nd link. Could I get some help guys? Once again? https://www.sololearn.com/discuss/2591536/?ref=app https://code.sololearn.com/c3R1T5hB5lqy/?ref=app
2 ответов
+ 6
The size of the code is not relevant in regards to the execution time. 
I made a simpler program which requires less calculations, but this solution I am giving is probably not the one you were supposed to find to solve your homework.
Note that the program works even with characters 😅 you can make some modification to allow only numbers.
https://code.sololearn.com/cCVLzc0T6Vk2/?ref=app
+ 5
The problem with getting the time limit is not that the code is too big,  but that you have a while (i == 1000000) inner loop that never modifies i,  so once you get inside you can never leave. 
Still the code being too large is a problem (first of all,  because it hinders understanding the code) 
What i'd do:
a) have a boolean flag saying if we have printed anything yet (initialized with false) 
b) inside the loop if flag is false,  
if a is nonzero,  print it (with no extra zeroes)  and set flag to true. 
If the flag is true,  just
printf(",%03d",a) -- %03d specifier says that the field must be 3 digits wide,  with unused digits printed as zeroes - just what we need. 
Using flag variables is ugly,  but here i don't know how to do better - maybe someone else advices a better way.



